Power Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Power - Essay ExampleThese three Cs in many slipway mirror the three branches of government within the United States the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Therefore, one may draw off the balance of power with the following phrase The commission proposes, the Council decides, the Court interprets.However, some differences remain, and perhaps the internal complex body part of the European Community may best be understood as a combination of distinguishable conceptions of democracy (Craig, 1997, 105). The EU is not a render, but a combination of states and therefore it derives its authority from its members. at a lower place the present organization of the EU, its balance of powers does not correspond to the classic principle of the separation of powers. The interplay of checks and balances does not split up a necessarily weaker result, but it is different (Pris, 2000, 4). Because of this distinct separation of powers that isnt really a separation of powers it is gru elling to determine who the head of the EU is or how, if the bodies were to disagree, much(prenominal) a disagreement would be handled if not by the Court.The Council or the Commission could emerge at the dominant body depending upon political circumstances. Each entity has its own strengths and weakness. Secondly, EC law is not stable. It is dynamic. The boundaries of the ECs powers move with the adoption of decisions, regulations, directives and the conclusion of international agreements (Pris, 2000, 4).The Commission members are appointed by their respective governments. Seats are not elected. Therefore, the risk is that the Commission might become too ruling and lack sufficient checks upon who may rise to enjoy such authority. The primary power of the Commission is its meek power it has a tremendous ability to advise and lead interest groups in a expressive style that is consistent with the strategies and goals outlined by the European Union. Rather than create a top-down re gulatory strategy, it employs consensus twist and negotiations as tools of intervention in competition issues. When needed, the Commission may choose to issue a earthly concern outcry against a faulty competitive practice. However, such an instance is rare and rear end be explained by the strongest competitive disadvantages, such as that imposed by a monopoly or too much state intervention into frugal affairs. These issues concern the Commission because its main goal is to ensure a fair pot and competitive platform for transnational industries. The main purpose of the Union is to enable economic development and such actions are contrary to free market liberalization principles. While not the neoliberalism that has at times been advocated by countries like the United States and criticized by others who saw the destruction created by strict adherence to the Washington Consensus advocated by aid lender institutions like the IMF, the European Unions Commission does take the opportu nity to stop monopolistic and anti-competitive practices.In this way, the European Union may offer a middle strategy that is neither Washington based neoliberalism or strong, state driven economic practices followed by Communist China or other Asian nations. Europes socialistic democratic mix has worked thus far to tailor the economic environment to fit economic necessity. This can be seen in the dramatic economic success stories of nations like Portugal, who has been cited as an example of EU economic success.The Commissions role in EU